Iran reviews US peace proposal as Trump warns of renewed attacks without deal

Iran is currently reviewing a new US peace proposal to end the ongoing war, while US President Donald Trump signaled his willingness to wait several days for Tehran's response. However, Trump simultaneously threatened to resume attacks if no agreement is reached. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei confirmed on Thursday that Iran had received the US position and was now reviewing it. The diplomatic efforts have apparently led to tensions between Washington and its ally Israel, highlighting the complex dynamics of the current crisis.

Trump described the negotiations as being in the "final stages" and "on the borderline." He suggested that an agreement could be reached "very quickly" or within a few days. At the same time, the US president warned of further military action: "Either we have a deal or we're going to do some things that are a little bit nasty, but hopefully that won't happen," Trump told reporters. The United States was prepared to proceed with further attacks on Tehran if Iran did not agree to a peace deal.

The diplomatic efforts have reportedly frustrated Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. According to US officials and Israeli sources, Trump and Netanyahu held a tense hour-long phone conversation on Tuesday that reflected differing views on how to approach the Iran war. Netanyahu pushed for a resumption of attacks on Iran, arguing that the delay only benefited the Iranians. Trump, meanwhile, continued to pursue a diplomatic solution while keeping military options on the table.

The tensions between the two allies illustrate the complex dynamics of the current crisis. While Israel is pushing for a harder military line, the Trump administration appears to be trying to avoid escalation through negotiations. Trump claimed after the conversation that Netanyahu would "do whatever I want," underscoring the different priorities of the two countries. The Israeli leadership may see the ongoing talks as a missed opportunity for decisive military strikes against Iran.

Iran, meanwhile, warned of the consequences of military escalation. Tehran stated that war in West Asia would spread far beyond the region if the United States and Israel resumed their attacks. This warning underscores the global implications that a continuation of hostilities could have. International actors also expressed concerns: Chinese President Xi Jinping called further hostilities in West Asia "inadvisable" during talks with Russian President Putin in Beijing.

The current ceasefire has yielded little concrete progress so far. The ongoing uncertainty in the region has led to rising energy prices, with gasoline prices in the US rising particularly sharply. These economic impacts are significantly weighing on Trump's approval ratings and increasing domestic political pressure on the president to find a quick solution. The Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important shipping routes for global oil trade, remains a critical point in the negotiations.

The negotiations are complicated by Iran's complex leadership structure. US Vice President Vance acknowledged difficulties in negotiating with a "fractured Iranian leadership." This internal fragmentation in Tehran could slow decision-making and complicate the implementation of any agreements. At the same time, the Trump administration must consider both Israeli security concerns and its own domestic political challenges.

The coming days will be crucial for the further development of the crisis. Trump's willingness to wait "a few days" suggests a narrow window for diplomatic solutions. Should the negotiations fail, a resumption of military confrontations threatens with unforeseeable regional and global consequences. The international community is watching developments with great concern, as escalation could destabilize the entire region and significantly impact the global economy.

The current situation also highlights the broader geopolitical implications of the conflict. Regional powers are closely monitoring the negotiations, as the outcome could reshape the balance of power in West Asia. The involvement of major powers like China and Russia in diplomatic discussions indicates the global significance of the crisis. Energy markets remain volatile, with traders closely watching for any signs of escalation that could disrupt oil supplies from the region.

Open questions remain regarding the specific contents of the US proposals and Iran's conditions for an agreement. The long-term impact on US-Israeli relations is also not yet clear, should the different approaches to Iran policy persist. The role of other regional actors and the position of European allies on the ongoing negotiations are also not yet fully clarified. The success or failure of these diplomatic efforts could set important precedents for future crisis management in the region and beyond.